Judge Warns Barron’s Story Could Be ‘Biased’ After He Reportedly Saved His Female Friend’s Life From Her Alleged Violent ‘Jealous’ Ex
StyleCaster Editors
In some ways, the internet treats the Trump family like regular celebrities. And that’s why there’s so much of a focus on what they’re doing, outside of President Trump’s policies. And no one gets the brunt of that as much as the President’s youngest son, Barron. Now, after reports that Barron Trump saved a life with his quick thinking, some are advising caution.
A British judge urged jurors in an assault case to treat Barron’s account of the incident with “caution” as it may be “biased.” Strong words.
Related: Here are the celebrities who support Donald Trump
Barron was credited with potentially saving a woman’s life, according to details from the Jan. 21 hearing at the Snaresbrook Crown Court in London. Reportedly, the woman was assaulted by her ex while Barron was on a FaceTime call with her. This was reported by multiple UK outlets, including The Times, The Guardian, and The Independent.
The transcript, obtained by People, shows that Barron called the City of London Police in England on Jan. 18, 2025, to report a woman allegedly “getting beat up.” He had reportedly met her on social media, and was said to have called the police “about eight minutes” after the alleged assault occurred.
“It’s really an emergency, please,” Barron said on the call.
The man, Russian citizen Matvei Rumiantsev, said on cross-examination on January 23, “What I was really unhappy about was that she was frankly leading [Barron] on,” according to Metro. “I am being portrayed as a jealous person who can lose his temper due to jealousy. I want to just make clear that her actions towards [Barron] were wrong, and it was not fair. I was jealous to some extent.”
Rumiantsev reportedly assaulted his ex after she referred to Barron as “sweetheart” and “flew into a rage” when he saw a FaceTime call from Barron on the woman’s phone in January of last year. The judge on the case said jurors should consider Barron Trump’s account as hearsay evidence since he wasn’t under oath and had not “been tested in cross-examination.”
“If he had done so, no doubt he could have been asked about things such as whether he ever got a good view of what happened, whether he actually saw [the woman] being assaulted, or jumped to this conclusion on the basis of her screams,” the judge said. “He might also have been asked whether his perception was biased because he was a close friend with [the woman].”
But hearsay evidence is allowed, the judge just cautioned the jury “to be careful” when reaching a verdict and not just consider his version of events. “You can rely on it, but you should be cautious in doing so, consider if it could be mistaken or biased by his friendship with [the woman], and not convict the defendant mainly in reliance on it,” he explained.
This all comes after recent reports about first lady Melania Trump trying to protect her son’s privacy. According to People, “Melania watches Barron constantly in an effort to be sure nobody messes with him or bullies him, as this is a constant worry with her,” a source explained. “She always knows where he is and what he’s doing.”
